Welcome Guest Login or Signup
LIVE CHAT | INSTANT MESSENGER | BOOKMARK
| LANGUAGE:  
Airlia
PROFILE   GALLERY   BLOGS   GUESTBOOK   FRIENDS   FAVORITES   VIDEOS  
 


Viewing 1 - 1 out of 1 Blogs.


Federal Express recently reported Jobs for 16 Year olds
Posted On 10/19/2010 00:44:28

"Where work will be" distributed by the Associated Press and Labour Day (September 6) in many parts of the title of a newspaper run an article. The main section of the article began, "When the company began re-employment free ..."

This is what brought me enough. Because I believe that companies, especially large companies, will not be "started to employ free." I believe that examples of jobs for 15 year olds on employers and employees, we are under for decades to fundamentally change the business.

No, I'm not an economist, I do not do the prospects of future employment. I'm just some connections for me, this is the media than we have been talking jobs for 16 year olds about different picture.

For example, in about the past decade, half of our "lost" like eight or nine million jobs thing, depending on your use of the count. Yes, some of them outsourced overseas, but I suspect not as many people think. Many of them lost their automation. However, I suspect, are mostly gone, period. The so-called Great Depression, only what is needed is to get rid of these coverage.

For example, Federal Express recently reported jobs for 16 year olds record quarterly earnings, and at the same time announced the layoff of nearly 2,000 people. In the New York Times article a few weeks ago to large companies at a very low interest rates to borrow money, and then sit on it ("low-cost loans for businesses to stimulate economic failure," October 3, 2010), Michael Gapen, economist at Barclays Capital, was quoted as saying, "(group), may actually use this new investment, more effective and layoffs."

Why is Federal Express and all other jobs for 16 year olds of employers cut in half, all those who in the past decade to work? Why sit here today billions in corporate funds rather than investing in more job opportunities? Because often under the gun to meet the needs of large employers or the next quarter, beating Wall Street expectations, the new reality is that the "employee" is a responsibility. Their average heart trouble. Their average earnings. And the worst is their bottom line type perspectivre, employees of the need or not their book.

Now, lest you think I did a black / white pictures in here, I have no doubt that the future will have the traditional "work" is located in the private sector, both large and small businesses. In fact, the AP article suggests there will be professionals and technology in health care and a lot of opportunities for skilled workers in the industry. But I think that is, both the quantity and the "work" will not return to our familiar species level.

Therefore, on the one hand, employers no longer need staff, or at least they want to as little as possible, because they can escape.

Then changing demographics. Here, I think both the aging of baby boomers and their offspring, especially 20-year-old root Yers. Poll after poll, there is an undercurrent of both groups have a strong interest in entrepreneurship. No one to see their "future" and long-term employer.

Therefore, on the other hand, it may be that people no longer want with a traditional "work", "employer."

The result? I believe that soon, perhaps within a year no more than two, we will listen to and on the "Big Bang" of small businesses read. Yes, this will include the traditional brick'n'mortar small business a lot, but it will also include jobs for 16 year olds for self-employed solo and two or three million people in the partnership. Yes, this will include the millions who consciously choose to become entrepreneurs, and at the same time to include more who take this path, because this is their only option (that traditional employment is no longer open to them .)

I am far from the first time start to explode. John Naisbitt said, as early as 1982 in his "big trend", and, most recently in 2005, Daniel Pink spoke about it, "free agent nation."

Pink drew between the "organization man," who, what he said is "employee" is considered to be from the 50's to 90's and the emerging "free agent" who he is "working prototype of a new description of a specific distinction "a" free, independent --- knowledge, self-reliance, the path diagram micropreneur. "




Your Ad Here
THE-MIC